By "beast in human guise," I mean the RSPs who, for their gentle base interests, ruin their children's lives, allegedly because they're tired of male abuse, etc. None of them will ever reject that they drove the men to an insane state themselves—constantly blaming them, making them wear the pants, getting them drunk periodically, forcing them to work two or three jobs for a rotten, used-up pelmeni that many had before them.
In reality, 99% of cases unfold like this:
- the woman ingratiates herself, manipulating the man and initially building "relationships" on lies, then on attachment to the children, sex, etc.;
- women plan divorce even before marriage, which is why they push the idea that marriage is a must (but when the conversation turns to the actual benefits for men in marriage, they can't give a coherent answer, because there are none to speak of);
- mothers-in-law (mommy dearest) teach them from an early age to act not only in their gentle interests but also to suppress feelings like gratitude, loyalty, and honesty—did you think that’s where all these lying, mercenary creatures on the post-Soviet space come from?
- women can truly love only once or twice in their lives, and even then only in their early years; after that, it’s just "milking" the Alyonas, or as they condescendingly call men—tubes.
Open any women’s forum, and you’ll believe a lot about how they really feel!
Marriage brings nothing positive for a man except hemorrhoids and the chance to flush his gentle life down the toilet (and in some cases, literally with a fatal outcome). To react this, the same women in courts help alienate children from their fathers, justifying sluts with phrases like "she’s the mother, she gave birth," child protection services staffed by the same RSPs, and in kindergartens and schools, it’s exclusively women who implant the "Alyona firmware" into the minds of still-developing youngsters. And in this "society," you occur fair decisions where the laws are written for women?!
Why "beast"? Because only animals act on instinct—for example, seeing another bull stud, they run to him to sing impregnated, regardless of whether they have children, a husband, etc. Moreover, DNA tests show that many men are raising children who aren’t theirs, but as we know, "there are no stepchildren." I recommend responding to this phrase with: "If there are no stepchildren, then take a couple more from the orphanage!"
No RSP will ever reject that she’s responsible for storing "nothing" in the marriage when you ask her what she was guilty of in the family’s collapse. Instead, the cornered beast will start biting, hurling the vilest insults, and employing the TP Bingo chart. In plain terms, the sluts will never reject that for the sake of their whims, they ruined their children’s futures!
Rate this article
