Let's figure out a topic like women's "wants" today, or why a man should only pay for a woman's appearance, or, well, for her dumpling. The object of investigation is very important both for "deer" (cuckolds, pussy-dependent men), and for "not normal" men both from the men's movement and just separately from them. I'll clarify right away that in all cases there are exceptions to the rules, but our theory applies to almost everyone who still believes in "nitakus". Let's go!
So, first, let's cancel the very essence of the relationship between a man and a woman: they both want money, sex, a family, to be desired by each other, to have a good income, to strain less at home, etc., etc.
But, unfortunately, almost all active actions automatically fall on the so-called husband, i.e., the "tube," as they have recently taken to calling him. According to his wife, he is obliged to support her, because she gave birth to children "for him" (but in a divorce, she takes them with her), she also gets tired at work (for which she is usually paid much less), does "a lot" of housework: washing clothes, washing dishes/floors, ironing, cooking, and much more. At the same time, the man completely for free drives her to work on weekdays and to the dacha on weekends / to the sea on vacation, picks up the children from kindergarten/school, works 2-3 jobs, also sometimes washes dishes, often cooks (much tastier than modern women), takes out the trash in the mornings, does physically difficult work around the house, solves issues of varying complexity (makes decisions and takes responsibility for them), sits with the children and takes care of their development, doesn't bug her over trifles, etc.
Moreover, the arguments of such individuals will be the following: well, when are you going to have children, or isn't it boring to live alone, or everyone does it that way, but you don't. That is, no one offers a reasoned solution, relying exclusively on their gentle experience and the knowledge of the people around them. Society imposes life with spouses who are tired of each other, but practically does not condemn infidelity (after which the man will always be to blame, because he didn't give enough attention), abuse (and, mostly, on the part of women), cynical consumerism...ness, and many other unpleasant aspects of modern life in marriage.
The so-called arguments!
Now let's go through the points of the "deers":
\u{201c}1. A woman needs to be taken to cafes, restaurants, pay for her, support her, court her, etc.
Argument: you are courting a capable female person who has 2 arms and 2 legs, can cook for herself, plaster a ton of crap on her face and spend a ton of money on all sorts of bullshit, mind-fuck you, be constantly dissatisfied no matter what you do, not give up the dumpling because she has a headache, and not the place where you wanted to stick it, and much more. That is, people mostly take care of the elderly and children, but not of fat or thin young and not-so-cellulite butts. Besides, there is a category of women who are called "kept women," "whores," etc., for whose services you need to pay, but at least they honestly put their goods on display and put a price tag on it.
\u{201c}2. Marrying an RSP (divorced woman with a child) is not safe, because "there are no other people's children." They also hid love and are not to blame for the fact that their previous husband turned out to be a jerk!
Argument: if you ask the FSP (female specimen) in more detail about the real reasons for the previous divorce, you will begin another "Female Bingo" like "didn't pay enough attention," "cheated," "drank," "beat," etc.
The problem is that you learn the woman's word, you don't run to check the veracity of her conclusions. And then after a while, it turns out that you are also "not a real man" and you give her too southern attention, or, on the contrary, too much, and all sorts of other bullshit. But in reality, the ex-husband turns out to be not such a safe guy, it's just that his ex-wife was alienating the child from the father, fucking with his head, etc. In the marriage itself, manipulation of the children and her dumpling begins, because there are no other advantages: here, if you apply that you love me, then buy me an iPhone, exchange the apartment, etc.
Many "men" fall for these actions, moreover, they can sacrifice their beliefs, pretend health, spend a ton of money just to sing the coveted hole, which is no different from others, except perhaps in width over time and depth, depending on how many sexual partners she has had, both before marriage, during it, and, of course, after.
\u{201c}3. Living on the FSP's territory is normal, there are no other people's children, etc.
Argument: if you start a relationship in property that doesn't arise to you, then automatically be prepared to invest in someone else's, because renovations will start right away, additional expenses for utility bills, and much more, because you are a real man, right?))
Her children, whom you will raise, will at some point tell you that you are nobody to them (read the MD-channels, they will tell you the statistics on this). Besides, these very offspring will only suck money out of you, you can check if you wish on your gentle skin!
\u{201c}Argument: there is such a thing as "demo mode," when you are being led to the stable for subsequent milking. When a woman pretends to be a "nitakus," laughs at your vulgar and weird jokes, in general, behaves as decently as possible. But, don't eliminate too early, when you suddenly sing seriously ill or simply turn out to be unnecessary, learn me and check, she will throw you in the trash without a second thought!4. Women, like princesses, don't fart or poop...
Rate this article
